<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Velvet Howler &#187; In Defense of Lost Causes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://velvethowler.com/archive/tag/in-defense-of-lost-causes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://velvethowler.com</link>
	<description>So much more than you wanted.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 00:33:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Judas!</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.thenation.com/doc/20080721/miller]]></link>
		<comments>http://velvethowler.com/2008/07/16/judas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 07:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advanced theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In Defense of Lost Causes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slavoj Zizek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.velvethowler.com/?p=1076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Daniel Miller, writing for <em>The Nation</em>, has recently published a &#8220;scathing critique&#8221; of Slavoj Žižek in general and his latest book, <em>In Defense of Lost Causes</em>, in particular, pointing to his pyrrhic descent into madness as indicated by the undoubtedly Hegelian trifecta of Hitchens-esque contrarianism, left-wing militarism and, of course, the culminating integration with hyper-reflexive late-capitalist consumerism. Miller concludes his review with this bit of speculative reason:

<blockquote>
  Throughout <em>In Defense of Lost Causes</em>, Žižek speaks recurrently, and in a sometimes disturbingly extravagant tone, of the &#8220;messianic&#8221; imperative of performing &#8220;a Leap of Faith&#8221; over the ravine of common sense in pursuit of &#8220;lost Causes, Causes that, from the space of sceptical wisdom, cannot but appear as crazy.&#8221; During such moments, it&#8217;s hard not to suspect that Žižek has finally gone mad.
</blockquote>

As a student of advanced theory, I don&#8217;t find any of this problematic. On the contrary, Miller&#8217;s reaction to Žižek&#8217;s &#8220;<em>Kehre</em>&#8221; typifies the kind of idolatry that surrounds innumerable public figures when the ego catches a glimpse of its own auratic reflection only to find itself spurned and alienated in the solipsistic idiocy of its own narcissistic <em>jouissance</em>.

Perhaps this gives some credibility to Rex Butler&#8217;s otherwise annoyingly stupid and culturally inept comparison of Žižek to Bob Dylan, only insofar as both succeeded in alienating large portions of their audience at a certain world-historical juncture. If this is the case, then I fully welcome Žižek&#8217;s theological turn and his advertisements for the BBC and Abercrombie &#38; Fitch.&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel Miller, writing for <em>The Nation</em>, has recently published a &#8220;scathing critique&#8221; of Slavoj Žižek in general and his latest book, <em>In Defense of Lost Causes</em>, in particular, pointing to his pyrrhic descent into madness as indicated by the undoubtedly Hegelian trifecta of Hitchens-esque contrarianism, left-wing militarism and, of course, the culminating integration with hyper-reflexive late-capitalist consumerism. Miller concludes his review with this bit of speculative reason:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Throughout <em>In Defense of Lost Causes</em>, Žižek speaks recurrently, and in a sometimes disturbingly extravagant tone, of the &#8220;messianic&#8221; imperative of performing &#8220;a Leap of Faith&#8221; over the ravine of common sense in pursuit of &#8220;lost Causes, Causes that, from the space of sceptical wisdom, cannot but appear as crazy.&#8221; During such moments, it&#8217;s hard not to suspect that Žižek has finally gone mad.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>As a student of advanced theory, I don&#8217;t find any of this problematic. On the contrary, Miller&#8217;s reaction to Žižek&#8217;s &#8220;<em>Kehre</em>&#8221; typifies the kind of idolatry that surrounds innumerable public figures when the ego catches a glimpse of its own auratic reflection only to find itself spurned and alienated in the solipsistic idiocy of its own narcissistic <em>jouissance</em>.</p>

<p>Perhaps this gives some credibility to Rex Butler&#8217;s otherwise annoyingly stupid and culturally inept comparison of Žižek to Bob Dylan, only insofar as both succeeded in alienating large portions of their audience at a certain world-historical juncture. If this is the case, then I fully welcome Žižek&#8217;s theological turn and his advertisements for the BBC and Abercrombie &amp; Fitch. If Miller represents the kind of audience Žižek had formerly captivated, then I eagerly await the sleeveless leather shirts and aviators to come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<br />&nbsp;<a href="http://velvethowler.com/2008/07/16/judas/">&#9733;</a>&nbsp;<br />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://velvethowler.com/2008/07/16/judas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

